A $200,000 portfolio could produce a welcome stream of retirement income.
The harder task is choosing how much income to take today without leaving the portfolio with too little growth for the years ahead.
Here is how I would approach it if I were retiring.

Image source: Getty Images
Set a realistic income target
I would begin with an annual dividend yield target of around 4% to 5%.
A 4% yield on $200,000 would generate approximately $8,000 a year before tax and franking credits. At 5%, the annual income would rise to $10,000.
I would aim near the middle of that range and focus on sustainable payments.
Pushing the portfolio towards a 7% or 8% yield could lead to excessive exposure to indebted businesses, cyclical dividends, or companies with limited growth. A slightly lower starting income can be worthwhile when the underlying holdings have scope to raise their payments over time.
Build the income base
I would place around $100,000 across established ASX dividend shares.
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) could provide fully franked dividends and exposure to a high-quality banking franchise.
Telstra Group Ltd (ASX: TLS) would add defensive earnings from mobile and telecommunications services, while Coles Group Ltd (ASX: COL) could provide another relatively steady source of cash flow through essential grocery spending.
I would also consider Transurban Group (ASX: TCL) and APA Group (ASX: APA). Their infrastructure assets offer income tied to toll-road traffic and energy networks rather than bank profits or household retail spending.
Spreading the allocation across several earnings drivers can make the income stream less dependent on one sector.
Add some property income
I would invest another $40,000 across selected real estate investment trusts.
HomeCo Daily Needs REIT (ASX: HDN) provides exposure to properties linked to supermarkets, pharmacies, and other everyday services. Charter Hall Long WALE REIT (ASX: CLW) owns properties supported by long leases, which can give investors greater visibility over rental income.
REIT distributions can be attractive, although debt levels and interest costs deserve close attention. I would keep this allocation diversified and avoid letting property become the dominant source of retirement income.
Keep some growth in the portfolio
I would place $40,000 into the Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (ASX: VGS).
A broad global ETF may initially produce less income than the ASX dividend shares, but it can help the portfolio grow and reduce reliance on the Australian economy.
That growth can support future withdrawals and protect spending power against inflation.
I would treat the global allocation as a source of future income rather than judge it solely by the distributions paid today. During strong market periods, an investor could also sell a small number of units to supplement dividends.
Hold a cash reserve
The final $20,000 would remain in cash or a short-term deposit.
That reserve could cover withdrawals during a market downturn and reduce the pressure to sell shares after prices have fallen.
Dividends and distributions could gradually refill the cash allocation, while excess cash could be reinvested when attractive opportunities appear.
Foolish takeaway
I would expect a portfolio structured this way to begin closer to the lower end of the 4% to 5% income range, producing roughly $8,000 to $9,000 a year before tax and franking credits.
The aim would be a retirement income stream with room to rise, supported by dividend-paying shares, property income, global growth, and a cash buffer.
That approach gives the portfolio several ways to support spending while preserving enough growth for a retirement that may last decades.