Markets rarely move in straight lines.
After a strong run across global equities, the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO), S&P 500 Index (SP: .INX), and NASDAQ-100 Index (NASDAQ: NDX) are peeling back from their recent all-time highs. For some investors, any red ink sparks the predictable concern: Is this the beginning of a broader stock market crash?
However, history suggests something different. Pullbacks after powerful rallies are not just normal — they are healthy. And importantly, a dip does not automatically evolve into a full-blown bear market.
Valuations are elevated but far from uniform
When markets correct near records, valuation anxiety usually takes centre stage.
In the US, parts of the S&P 500 trade above long-run averages, especially in sectors tied to AI infrastructure, cloud computing, and large-cap tech. The Nasdaq 100 Index has spent much of recent months priced well above historic multiples.
Australia is a different picture. The ASX 200 trades at a premium to its long-term average, yet it lacks the extreme concentration risk seen in the US. Local earnings have generally remained positive, and while not booming, they have certainly not turned negative.
Earnings "misses" have appeared on both sides of the Pacific. This is normal. Forecasts tend to overshoot, companies deliver uneven quarters, and commentary often exaggerates the short-term noise. What matters is that the fundamentals, i.e. their actual business operation backdrop, remain intact and not deteriorating.
The AI debate: Bubble, boom, or somewhere in between?
Every market cycle has a narrative that captures global attention. Today, that story is artificial intelligence.
There are two rational camps:
1. The bubble-risk argument
- Massive capex on chips, data centres, energy infrastructure, and software.
- Valuations on select AI beneficiaries are deeply stretched.
- Circular financing — where soaring share prices enable more equity issuance, which funds further expansion — can create the illusion of infinite demand.
These risks aren't imaginary. We saw similar patterns during the dot-com boom, and stretched expectations can unwind quickly if sentiment flips.
2. The structural-growth argument
- AI is already producing real revenue, cost efficiencies, and productivity improvements.
- Cloud adoption and software spend remain on long-term uptrends.
- Even if some names are expensive, the earnings behind them continue to grow faster than most sectors.
Both sides can be true. That's what makes timing impossible — and why investors should be careful declaring a stock market crash "inevitable." As the famous quote goes, "markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent".
Pullbacks are normal
Zoom out, and market history tells a consistent story:
- The vast majority of corrections do not become market crashes.
- New highs are typically followed by mild digestion, not disaster.
- Earnings trends, not headlines, drive long-term market direction.
In Australia, banking, resources, healthcare, and infrastructure — which make up a large portion of the ASX 200 — do not carry the same speculative fever as AI-heavy US indices. Even if sentiment weakens, there are stable dividend payers and defensive cash flow generators that offer resilience.
What long-term investors should take from this moment
For long-term investors, the present moment calls for a calm, steady lens. Valuations have expanded and volatility tends to cluster around elevated multiples, but this is a normal feature of markets rather than a flashing warning sign. History shows that pullbacks after strong rallies aren't a breakdown in the system — they're simply part of how markets breathe.
Trying to predict a stock market crash has always been an extremely difficult strategy to win with. Even seasoned professionals rarely get the timing right. Instead of fixating on daily swings, it's far more useful to watch the underlying business operations that actually shape long-term returns.
And on that front, the picture remains constructive. Earnings in Australia and the US are broadly positive, cash-generative companies continue to execute, and the long-term engine of wealth creation of the stock market hasn't changed. Whether markets fall 5%, 10%, or more, periods of turbulence have always passed, and the compounding nature of investing marches on.
