Is your superannuation investing on track to retire in 10 years?

Retirement is closer than you think. Are you ready?

Can you retire in 10 years?

For many Australians in their mid-50s, that question feels uncomfortably close to home. The numbers tell an important story.

According to recent data, the average superannuation balance for Australians aged 55 sits well below what most experts consider necessary for a "comfortable" retirement at 65. Meanwhile, industry benchmarks suggest a couple retiring at 65 may need well over $600,000 in super to fund a comfortable lifestyle, depending on spending expectations and eligibility for the Age Pension.

That gap is the simple number most Australians miss.

It is not just about how much you have today. It is about how much your capital can grow over the next decade.

Senior lady jumping against orange background.

Image source: Getty Images

The 10-year compounding window

Over the past 30 years, the Australian share market has delivered average annual returns of around 9.3%, including dividends. That does not mean markets rise by 9.3% every year. Some years are strong, others are deeply negative. However, over long periods, that average has held remarkably steady.

If you are 55 today and planning to retire at 65, you still have a full decade for your capital to compound.

For example, a $400,000 super balance growing at an average rate close to long-term market returns could look very different after 10 years of compounding. Even modest additional contributions during this period can meaningfully lift the final balance.

The key insight is this: the last 10 years before retirement are not a time when growth stops mattering. In many cases, they matter most.

The sequencing risk trap

There is, however, a major risk that often goes overlooked.

It is known as sequencing risk.

This refers to the danger of experiencing poor market returns in the years immediately before or after retirement. A sharp downturn just as you begin drawing income can have a disproportionate impact on how long your capital lasts.

This is why many investors think carefully about how they transition from growth to income. It is rarely an all-or-nothing decision.

Strategies such as dollar-cost averaging, where investments are made progressively over time rather than in one lump sum, are often discussed as a way to smooth out entry points and reduce the impact of short-term volatility. While no strategy removes market risk entirely, spreading investments over time can help investors navigate the natural ups and downs of markets and potentially stay closer to long-term average returns.

Growth first, income second

One of the most common mistakes is focusing too early on income and yield, especially when retirement is still years away.

For many Australians at 55, the priority over the next decade may still be capital growth. As retirement approaches, portfolios can gradually shift toward more income-oriented assets, depending on personal circumstances, risk tolerance, and access to other income sources.

The simple number that matters is not just your current super balance.

It is the number you are likely to have at 65.

That difference depends on three things:

  • Your starting balance
  • Your contribution rate over the next decade
  • Your average return over that period

Retirement in 10 years is not simply about cutting spending or hoping the Age Pension fills the gap. It is about making deliberate decisions during what could be the most powerful compounding phase of your financial life.

For Australians approaching their mid-50s, the question is not whether retirement is close.

It is whether the next 10 years are being used wisely.

Motley Fool contributor Leigh Gant has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Superannuation

An older female ASX investor holds a gangster-style fist pump pose showing off gold rings with dollar signs on them.
Superannuation

How much superannuation is needed to generate $150,000 per year in passive income?

On a $150,000 per year passive income, you could afford an extravagant retirement lifestyle.

Read more »

Australian dollar notes in the pocket of a man's jeans, symbolising dividends.
Superannuation

How much is needed in superannuation to target $80,000 a year in passive income?

Let's run the numbers on how much you need to save.

Read more »

Increasing piles of coins and trees.
Superannuation

Average superannuation balance of Australians aged 60 to 65 in FY27. How does yours compare?

Is your superannuation balance in line with others the same age?

Read more »

Numerous Australian dollar notes laid out.
Superannuation

Superannuation funds fell in value in September. See how much they're down

Weak share markets brought a run of positive months to an end.

Read more »

Numerous Australian dollar notes laid out.
Superannuation

Is your superannuation fund any good? How to compare performance and fees

Being stuck in a dud fund can cost you a lot.

Read more »

A couple working on a laptop laugh as they discuss their ASX share portfolio.
Superannuation

Here's the average superannuation balance at 60 and 70 in Australia

Let's run the numbers and see how you compare.

Read more »

Woman with $50 notes in her hand thinking, symbolising dividends.
Superannuation

How much do I need in my superannuation to generate a $108,000 annual passive income?

A passive income of this size means you could live an affluence retirement lifestyle.

Read more »

Australian dollar notes in the pocket of a man's jeans, symbolising dividends.
Superannuation

Average superannuation balance at 45. How does yours compare?

It pays to ensure your retirement savings are on track.

Read more »