2 reasons Elon Musk's Twitter break-up is destined to lose in court

Historically, it has been tough for someone to abandon a deal after they signed it just because they get cold feet.

| More on:
a stern judge slams a gavel onto her desk with the American flag visible in the background.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

Exciting news dropped over the last couple of days when Elon Musk officially announced he intends to back away from his Twitter (NYSE: TWTR) buyout deal. Musk's lawyers say the company has refused to give them proper information regarding how many Twitter accounts are bots, meaning it broke its contractual obligations.

The main accusation is that the percentage of spam bots among the monetizable daily active users (mDAUs) is materially higher than the 5% number Twitter purports in its financial documents. Immediately after the announcement from the Musk team, Twitter's board chair Bret Taylor tweeted (of course) that the company plans to take Musk to court to legally force him to close the deal at the agreed-upon price.

Here are two reasons Elon Musk will be legally forced to close the Twitter deal, and why he might slither out unscathed. 

1. The bots are not a legitimate excuse 

According to the letter Musk's lawyers released, his main complaint is that Twitter's bot problem is much worse than the company claims. If true, this would obviously be a huge problem, especially because Twitter's main business is to sell advertisements to these users. Advertisers wouldn't be very happy if it turned out a ton of them were fake.

While definitely a concern in a vacuum, it doesn't seem likely this accusation will enable Musk to break off a signed merger agreement. For one, Musk clearly knew about the bot problem before he made the offer to Twitter -- it was one of the reasons he wanted to buy the company in the first place. His account has a history of bots responding to his tweets trying to defraud people with cryptocurrency scams, so it is not like he was unaware of the problem.

Second, this was something a potential buyer is supposed to do before signing a deal. If you sign a contract to purchase a house at a certain price before going to inspect it in person, but then find cockroaches all over the place, you can't just renege on the deal because you feel stupid. The Delaware Court (where the legal battle is set to take place) will likely rule the same way with Musk unless evidence materializes that a huge portion of Twitter's active accounts is fake.

Speaking of legal rulings, there are prior court cases that can guide us on what the Delaware Court may rule in this case. In 2000, Tyson Foods agreed to buy another food producer called IBP Corporation. When the market and economy went into a downturn in 2001 and 2002, Tyson tried to get out of the deal because it argued it had gotten misleading information about IBP's business. Sound familiar?

The court argued that Tyson had to go through with the deal. The Tyson-IBP case has been a landmark decision, guiding companies, shareholders, and judges in deciding whether a merger agreement has to go through. With this in consideration, Musk will have to bring some incredibly compelling evidence to convince the Delaware Court to side with him on this case. 

Why Musk still might win

Don't think this is a cinch for Twitter just yet. Anything and everything can happen in a legal battle, and there's a reason Twitter's stock trades below $37 a share when the proposed buyout was at $54.20. Musk's team could find evidence that Twitter has been defrauding investors for years by lying about its bot problem. How likely is this? I'm not sure. But it definitely isn't zero.

Investors should also consider Musk's past history with the law. The Solar City deal, the fake take-private announcement for Tesla, and the one-million robotaxi claim have skirted, if not passed, the line of what is legal or not in the business world. Even if the precedent is for the court to rule against Elon Musk, it might not matter, because the man always seems to get what he wants.

Get your popcorn ready. The troubled Twitter takeout is shaping up to be one of the biggest legal battles in business history.

This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

Brett Schafer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Tesla and Twitter. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on International Stock News

a business exec making a grab for money
International Stock News

3 reasons I'm still loading up on Nvidia shares

Nvidia's clients haven't changed their spending decisions following DeepSeek's breakthrough.

Read more »

Smiling woman driving a car.
International Stock News

Who owns Tesla?

Aside from Elon Musk, who else has skin in the game?

Read more »

A little boy surrounded by green grass and trees looks up at the sky, waiting for rain or sunshine.
International Stock News

Prediction: Nvidia stock is going to soar after February 26

Nvidia stock has started 2025 badly, but it may be able to regain its mojo later this month.

Read more »

International Stock News

Mark Zuckerberg just delivered incredible news for Nvidia stock investors

What did Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg say and what does it mean for AI stocks like Nvidia?

Read more »

Happy woman on her phone while her electric vehicle charges.
International Stock News

Better EV stock: Rivian vs. Tesla

Tesla is the leader in EVs, but its fourth-quarter results were unimpressive. Rivian is a speculative EV stock, but the…

Read more »

a man sits at his computer screen with a cup of coffee in one hand and the other shielding the bottom half of his face with his eyes closed although he is recoiling from bad news.
International Stock News

Why Alphabet stock just slumped 7%

Alphabet reported mixed results in its fourth-quarter financial report.

Read more »

a tired and sad looking bulldog sits at an office desk with a pen an paper on it and a cup of coffee with his head resting on the desk as he gives a mournful look to the camera.
International Stock News

These were the 5 worst-performing stocks in the Nasdaq-100 in January 2025

Although most stocks made forward progress in January, a few of them bucked the bigger trend for understandable reasons.

Read more »

Man pointing at a blue rising share price graph.
International Stock News

Why Nvidia stock just surged

The good news continues to pour in for the artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaker.

Read more »