How do you solve a problem like inflation?

The offical inflation rate is 5.1% according to today’s release from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Inflation ahead written on a yellow sign.

Image source: Getty Images

How do you solve a problem like inflation?

Bloody hell. 5.1%

Five. Point. One. Per cent.

That’s the official inflation rate, according to today’s release from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Now, let’s be honest – we all knew prices were going up.

And by a lot.

We felt it at the pump. At the supermarket. At the butcher, baker and candlestick maker.

Yes, the official number is higher than expected, but only by a little (relatively speaking).

Still, seeing that number, in black and white, is a pretty serious reality check.

I think history will judge the RBA badly for holding onto low rates for so long, even though their intent was noble.

They had months to see what was happening in the United States.

But they, and others, hoped for the best (or stuck their heads in the sand, if you’re less kind).

It was, I think objectively, a low probability bet.

Which isn’t to say they couldn’t have been right.

But the odds weren’t great.

And now we know.

It’s been my view that:

1. The RBA’s change from being ‘proactive’ – acting in advance – to ‘reactive’ – waiting for the data – would be a mistake. It’s too early to tell, but it doesn’t look good; and

2. The RBA should have been ‘normalising’ rates months and months ago, rather than holding to ‘emergency levels’ for so long

Time will tell, and hopefully lessons will be learned (if I’m right).

But that’s both water under the bridge and also a conversation for another, future time.

The question now is what will the RBA do in response.

Last month, the Reserve’s rhetoric (paraphrased) changed from ‘it’s a long time away’ to ‘the next couple of months will matter’.


Can they really afford to ignore an inflation number with a 5 in front, or kick the 5% larger can down the road for a little longer?

Or should they grasp the nettle and act now?

I think you know my view.

The inflation genie is out of the bottle.

There is more pain ahead.

I think they have little choice but to start to raise rates, and to do it next week.

Why wouldn’t they?

No, it’s not a rhetorical question; there are real reasons they might hold fire.

Most of the inflation is ‘supply push’, rather than ‘demand pull’. That is, it’s not reckless spending that needs to be cooled, but rather higher energy prices and a stuttering supply chain that’s causing problems… and raising rates can’t influence those factors.

And the economy is still recovering from the COVID impacts… taking away the punch bowl just as customers are returning is, well, imperfect timing to say the least.

And – and I desperately hope this isn’t part of the calculus – the RBA won’t want to be seen as influencing the election campaign or outcome by bumping up lending costs so close to polling day.

Are these enough?

I don’t think so. Then again, I haven’t spent decades as a central bank bureaucrat, so I don’t pretend to have their expertise or depth of knowledge.

Frankly, though, right now we’re really only talking about timing. And probably as little as a month.

If they don’t raise rates next week, it’ll probably be done in June anyway. July at the latest.

So, rates are going up.

Probably by an uncomfortable amount, if you’re a borrower… especially if you borrowed recently.

Yes, raising costs to, well, restrain rising costs is counterintuitive.

But the RBA will raise rates to cool an overheating economy (at least price-wise).

And – you won’t hear this from the pollies or the usual suspects – that’s precisely what’s supposed to happen at this point in the economic cycle.

For years, people have tried to pretend that the only economic circumstances are ‘a lot’ and ‘more’.

That’s been the result of the 1990s recession, followed by the GFC, followed by the COVID recession.

That’s why we have an official cash rate of 0.1%.

And the pollies all want to put ‘downward pressure’ on interest rates.

Newsflash: Rates are supposed to go both ways.

That’s. How. They. Work.

And, even when it feels uncomfortable (and that time is coming) it’s infinitely better than the alternative.

Well-implemented monetary policy (interest rates) and fiscal policy (government decisions on taxation and spending) are supposed to make economic cycles less extreme.

They take the top off the booms, and take the bottoms off the crashes.

You can’t do one without the other.

A boom left, unchecked, creates a deeper and longer crash.

Higher rates (and, if our pollies had guts, a structurally-balanced budget) would do precisely that: gradually applying the brakes and things get overheated, and gradually pushing on the accelerator when things slow down.

No-one wants to pay higher interest rates on their mortgage.

No-one wants to pay more on a business loan.

But it is much, much better than enduring a long, deep crash that comes when an economy runs too hot for too long.

There is no magic wand, unfortunately.

Right now, we’re about to take some medicine – medicine that doesn’t taste good, but will stop us getting sicker.

As unwelcome and uncomfortable as it is, paying a little more on a home loan is infinitely better than losing your job, or your business.

That’s the honest truth you won’t hear from a politician during this election campaign.

But it’s the truth nonetheless.

I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad – if honest – news, but higher rates are coming, they’re going to hurt, but they’re better than the alternative, even if we’d like to close our eyes, put out fingers in our ears and say ‘lalalalalala’ until the feeling passes.

Fool on!

Motley Fool contributor Scott Phillips has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.

More on Motley Fool Take Stock

man and woman analyse financial report and share price
Motley Fool Take Stock

Want to pay less tax? Or make more money?

You should be careful that you don’t let emotions lead you into making a big mistake.

Read more »

Motley Fool chief investment officer Scott Phillips
Motley Fool Take Stock

Market crash: A message from our CIO

Have we seen the absolute peak of human capitalism? I don't think so, which is why I'm continuing to invest,…

Read more »

A child covering his eyes hiding from a toy bear representing a bear market for ASX shares
Motley Fool Take Stock

Get ready for the bear market headlines!

We all think we’ll invest during a crash, but do we?

Read more »

A man sits in despair at his computer with his hands either side of his head, staring into the screen with a pained and anguished look on his face, in a home office setting.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Investing is hard enough…

You don't get extra points for 'degree of difficulty'.

Read more »

a man weraing a suit sits nervously at his laptop computer biting into his clenched hand with nerves, and perhaps fear.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Are you ready for GFC Mark II?

The regulator won't say it but I will: they're worried about a GFC.

Read more »

A man sits nervously at his computer with his mouth resting against his hands clasped in front of him as he stares at the screen of his computer on a home desk.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Interest rates have mugged shares… for now

If some share prices are at panic levels, that opportunity isn’t going to be around for long.

Read more »

Kid with a brown paper bag on his head which has a sad face on it sits in front of an old style computer representing falling ASX 200 tech shares today
Motley Fool Take Stock

Sick of the ASX falls? Me too!

No, it’s not comfortable, but here's what I plan to do.

Read more »

Australian flag with a ballot box and someone putting a vote in.
Motley Fool Take Stock

My hope for election day — and the next three years

The investor's guide to the Federal election.

Read more »