MENU

What the Labor franking credit change means for retirees

Fairfax Media Limited (ASX: FXJ) is reporting that Labor plan to remove franking credit refunds from the tax system.

Most readers are probably aware that franking credits are ‘attached’ to most Australian dividend payments. Franking credits are generated when a company pays tax and helps avoid company profits being taxed twice – which is the case in a lot of other countries around the world.

The franking credit is a refundable tax credit. This means the franking credits reduce taxes owed or generates a refund if the franking credit total is more than the tax charged.

Labor are proposing that if the tax result is a refund then the individual doesn’t receive the refund. However, franking credits will still reduce taxes owed.

Bill Shorten emphasised that people will not be paying more tax, “these people will no longer receive a cash refund – but they will not be paying any additional tax.”

Labor say that reforming the system will save the budget $11.4 billion over the final two years of the current forward estimates and $59 billion over the medium-term.

This will affect every retiree in slightly different ways, depending on how their assets are structured, their income and franking credit position.

I’m not an expert, but my understanding is that this will hurt the wealth of the middle class more than the super wealthy. Self-managed super funds are affected as well, but that’s different too.

With the way franking credits and the tax free threshold work, an individual’s only taxable income could be from a (non-SMSF) portfolio worth $100,000 invested in bank stocks like Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) and Westpac Banking Corp (ASX: WBC) and that person will lose all of their franking credit refund.

It’s a similar franking credit refund complete loss for a person’s portfolio worth $200,000.

When a person’s portfolio is worth more than around say $300,000 they may start being charged tax because their income is now above the tax-free threshold, assuming that their portfolio is their sole source of income. Of course, it completely depends on the dividend yield and the make up of the portfolio. But, the point is that the individual could start being charged tax. For example, the tax charged could be $1,000 which reduces the refund by $1,000. The individual tax rate at 19% (excluding Medicare) is still less than the 30% franking credit refund rate. This person is affected less, but still loses their refund.

The situation repeats itself for bigger portfolios, as the tax charged becomes bigger and the refund becomes smaller. The bigger the portfolio, the less they lose out on a refund.

Finally, with a portfolio worth somewhere between $1 million to $2 million (depending on the portfolio’s overall yield), the tax charge is so much that it’s more than the franking credit total and the individual is in a tax payable position. Therefore, they aren’t affected by this at all.

Someone with a $4 million portfolio might not be affected by this at all, whereas someone with a $100,000 portfolio or $500,000 portfolio loses out.

The situation is more complicated with the SMSF $1.6 million cap, so if you get franking credits from your SMSF portfolio it’s worth asking your accountant how you would be affected.

Foolish takeaway

At this stage, it is only a planned move by Labor and it would require Bill Shorten to win the next election. As a share man I would have preferred Labor focus on negative gearing or reducing the capital gain discount.

Don’t Buy A SINGLE Stock Until You Read This

While conflict overseas is all media talking-heads seem to mention these days, the billionaire founder of Tesla is losing sleep over what he sees as a far bigger threat.

Elon Musk Warns: This has “vastly more risk than North Korea”

If you missed your opportunity to get in on Google, Microsoft, or Amazon in their early days, don't let it happen again. This emerging technology trend could offer a second chance for anyone who wishes they took part in these millionaire-maker stocks.

Click here to discover more!

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Two New Stock Picks Every Month!

Not to alarm you, but you’re about to miss a very important event! Chief Investment Advisor Scott Phillips and his team at Motley Fool Share Advisor are about to reveal their latest official stock recommendation. The premium “buy alert” will be unveiled to members and you can be among the first to act on the tip.

Don’t let this opportunity pass you by – this is your chance to get in early!

Simply enter your email now to find out how you can get instant access.

By clicking this button, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our website and about other products and services we think might interest you. You can unsubscribe from Take Stock at anytime. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information.