Vanguard Australian Shares ETF (VAS): Should we be worried about CBA?

Has CBA grown too big for VAS' boots?

| More on:
A man casually dressed looks to the side in a pensive, thoughtful manner with one hand under his chin, holding a mobile phone in his hand while thinking about something.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

It's been a rough couple of weeks for the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS). Back on Valentine's Day, VAS units closed at $105.55 each. Today, those same units are going for just $102.41. That's nearly 3% below where they were almost a fortnight ago.

Even so, this is a small bump in the road of what has been a very lucrative few months for VAS investors. It was only back in August that this popular ASX index fund was at a new 52-week low of $92.93 a unit.

Since then, investors have enjoyed a paper capital gain worth more than 10%. Adding dividend returns to that, and we have a very healthy investment to have owned indeed.

Now, I'm personally a VAS investor and have profited alongside other ASX investors in this exchange-traded fund (ETF)'s recent gains.

However, with this ETF still at a relatively high valuation, some investors might be worried about what the future might hold. That's thanks to a very small group of ASX shares, led by Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA).

Is VAS an ASX sell if CBA is?

It's no secret that the big four ASX bank stocks, led by CBA, dominate the Australian share market. As the Vanguard Australian Shares ETF is a reflection of said share market, the same can be said of VAS units.

As of 31 January, CBA, together with National Australia Bank Ltd (ASX: NAB), Westpac Banking Corp (ASX: WBC), and ANZ Group Holdings Ltd (ASX: ANZ), made up 22.77% of VAS' entire portfolio. That consists of roughly 300 ASX shares, mind you.

CBA alone accounted for 10.2%.

This means that more than $10 out of every $100 invested in VAS right now will end up in CBA shares.

Now, to be fair, this heavy concentration in the ASX banks has been a blessing for the Vanguard Australian Shares ETF over recent years.

Over the past 12 months alone, CBA shares have galloped 33% higher. Westpac has gained 20%. NAB was on track for a 21%-or-so rise before its sobering update this month made investors pump the brakes. Now, its 12-month rise sits at a far more sober 4%. It's a similar story with ANZ, which has tiptoed 5% higher since last February.

But it's CBA that might have some investors worried.

Much has been made about CBA shares' inherent disconnection to their own financial fundamentals. Its half-year earnings update this month had the bank reporting a 2% rise in cash net profits.

That's arguably decent. But enough to justify a 33% share price runup since February 2024? When its full-year earnings for FY2024 show falling profits? It's hard to make that math work.

So let's say, for argument's sake, that CBA shares are woefully overvalued. That should give pause to any VAS investor. Given that more than one-tenth of this index fund is tied to this bank's fortunes and all.

Foolish takeaway

I do wish that VAS wasn't so heavily tilted towards the ASX banks right now, and CBA in particular. But I'm still not selling this ETF. Index funds are designed to add to their winners and prune their losers over time.

Sure, I think there's a good chance CBA shares will come back to earth at some point. But even if the bank, for argument's sake, fell 50% tomorrow, it theoretically would mean that VAS units only take a 5.1% hit, given the bank's 10.2% weighting in the index fund's portfolio. As such, I'd rather own VAS units right now than CBA shares.

Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has positions in National Australia Bank and Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Index investing

A woman in a red dress holding up a red graph.
Index investing

See which companies have just been added to key ASX indices

See which companies are in and out of the ASX 50 and the ASX 100 indices.

Read more »

A woman with an open laptop holding a globe on a desk ponders something.
ETFs

Own Vanguard's VGS ETF? Here's what you're invested in

This popular index fund isn't as diversified as it might look.

Read more »

Two happy excited friends in euphoria mood after winning in a bet with a smartphone in hand.
Index investing

The Vanguard Australian Shares ETF (VAS) now has its first real ASX rival

VAS is not the only ASX 300 ETF in town anymore.

Read more »

Zig zaggy green arrow with an American note in the background.
Index investing

The IVV ETF is at a record high. Here are 3 reasons why ASX investors may consider buying.

Even Buffett has endorsed this fund...

Read more »

A casually dressed woman at home on her couch looks at index fund charts on her laptop
Dividend Investing

Why this Australian dividend stock is built to last

This dividend veteran can suit almost any investor.

Read more »

Young boy looks shocked as he lifts glasses above his eyes in front of a stock market graph. representing three ASX 300 shares hitting 52-week lows today
Index investing

These ASX index funds have returned at least 15% per annum since 2022

These funds have done even better than the ASX since 2022.

Read more »

Warren Buffett
Best Shares

Is the iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV) the smartest investment you can make today?

Buffett himself might approve.

Read more »

a graph indicating escalating results
Record Highs

Own the Vanguard Australian Shares ETF (VAS)? It just hit a new record high

This popular index fund has never been more expensive.

Read more »