Why I'd buy the Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) for diversification and returns

This could be one of the best sectors to own to 2030.

| More on:
woman jumping for joy in front of lock and key

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

The Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF (ASX: HACK) has been a great investment to hold since it listed in 2016, returning an impressive average of around 18.65% per annum.

Of course, past performance is not a guarantee of future performance, but I believe the HACK ETF could continue to deliver for many years to come.

ASX exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are great investments for gaining broad-based exposure to a certain share market, index, or sector. And as its name suggests, the HACK ETF provides exposure to the cybersecurity sector.

It is invested in global giants like Broadcom, Crowdstrike, Palo Alto Networks, and Cloudflare, as well as smaller players such as NCC Group, Radware, and Blackberry.

Of all the possible sectors to invest in, I believe cybersecurity could be among the best due to the integral nature of the service and its potential for future growth.

Defensive nature

So many important and essential services are now carried out online: banking, completing tax returns, shopping, maintenance of medical records, applying for driver's licences and passports, communications, and much more.

Protecting all of these records and information is critical, and governments' and businesses' endeavours to keep citizens and customers safe from cyber threats are now big business. Furthermore, regardless of whether the economy is booming or going through a recession, the need for cybersecurity measures is not really optional.

As such, I believe revenue and profits generated by this collective group of companies are very defensive and unlikely to decline during difficult economic periods.

When a business has a stable earnings base, it could also result in less volatility for its share price, so the HACK ETF has the potential to outperform during bear markets.

Long-term growth of cybercrime

Due to the increasing instances of cybercrime worldwide, I believe increased spending on cybersecurity by governments and businesses is virtually a given.

The picture in Australia is similar to that of the rest of the world. The Australian Signals Directorate's Australian Cyber Security Centre regularly releases cybercrime statistics, which I think reinforces the necessity of the types of companies held by the HACK ETF.

In FY24, the ASD received 36,700 calls to the Australian cyber security hotline, which was an increase of 12% year over year. The average self-reported cost of cybercrime per report for individuals was $30,700, an increase of 17%.

The growth of global e-commerce alone also helps demonstrate the growing importance of widespread cybersecurity.

According to Statista, worldwide e-commerce revenue is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.8% between 2025 to 2029, with user penetration expected to rise from 42.4% in 2025 to 49.1% by 2029. The total number of online shoppers is expected to reach 3.6 billion in 2029.

With all of this growth across both the uptake of e-commerce and the occurrence of cybercrime, I'm confident of ongoing revenue growth for the companies within the Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF over the long term.

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, and Radware. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended Broadcom and Palo Alto Networks. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended BlackBerry and CrowdStrike. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on ETFs

A man lays a brick on a wall he is building with a look of joy on his face.
ETFs

This is how I would build a sound ETF portfolio from scratch

Aim for broad market exposure, keep it simple and minimize costs.

Read more »

A businessman hugs his computer and smiles.
ETFs

5 excellent ASX ETFs to buy and hold for 10 years

Investors could build wealth over the long term with these funds.

Read more »

Young man with a laptop in hand watching stocks and trends on a digital chart.
ETFs

3 top ASX ETFs for beginners to buy with $1,000

Let's see why beginners could do a lot worse than buying these funds.

Read more »

woman in white shirt splashing money in the air
Dividend Investing

Own IVV or IOO ETFs? It's dividend payday for you!

Investors holding iShares ETFs comprised of international shares will receive their dividends today.

Read more »

A rocket blasts off into space with planet behind it.
ETFs

Forget AI – these ASX ETFs are riding a global megatrend with years of tailwinds ahead

Defence spending is exploding globally, and these ASX ETFs are already riding the wave.

Read more »

Woman using a pen on a digital stock market chart in an office.
ETFs

2 ETFs that are good bets to beat the ASX 200 in 2026

If I wanted to outperform the ASX 200 in 2026, I’d focus less on short-term noise and more on where…

Read more »

A young man talks tech on his phone while looking at a laptop. A financial graph is superimposed across the image.
ETFs

Why these ASX ETFs could be strong buys in 2026

These funds offer investors access to exciting themes.

Read more »

Two young boys with tennis racquets and wearing caps shake hands over a tennis ten on a tennie court.
ETFs

What is the Russell 2000 Index and why has it been booming over the past 6 months?

Does your portfolio include exposure to US small-caps?

Read more »