A simple fix for superannuation

It's time to return Super to its original purpose, to remove the complexity and to stop it being used as a tax dodge.

Australian notes and coins surrounded by a calculator and the word super spelt out.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Before we start… would you like to attend a free one-hour online money and-investing Q&A with yours truly?

This week, we've been running a series of seminars under the banner of 'Financial Literacy Week', covering important financial topics like budgeting, eliminating debts, saving and investing.

Today is the last day. But no prior knowledge is necessary.

It's going to just be a 60 minute Q&A session.

We've been collecting questions all week, and you can ask them live, during the webinar.

It's running for an hour from 12.30pm AEDT, today. (Also, I've been told we have a very special offer. So yes, at the end I will be selling something, but it's… cheap. By which I mean… cheap.

But you don't have to buy anything to attend, and I won't be doing a hard sell.

So, if you'd like to know more about it, reserve a spot, and sign up for a handy reminder email, just click here! See you at 12.30pm AEDT!


So, Treasurer, can I fix the Superannuation and pension mess for you?

Yes, that's a bold idea. Especially from someone who isn't in the public service or politics.

But maybe that's the point.

I'm not encumbered by electoral considerations, political ideology or 'not invented here' syndrome.

Nor do I have the weight of vested interests: donors, impacted businesses, or anything else.

So, while I don't claim to have perfect insight, I have the benefit of physical and metaphorical distance.

First, though, let's look at the mess: there are contribution limits, and catch-up limits. There's preservation ages, transition to retirement, accumulation accounts and pension accounts. There's indexing, minimum contributions… seriously, the thing is a dog's breakfast. Then there's the new two-tier tax approach introduced by the government, based on the size of the Super balance.

And then there are the disincentives. How much can you earn before losing the pension? How much can you leave in Super, to benefit your heirs? How can you use Super to save paying tax?

Why is this such a mess? Votes, mostly. Some ideology. And so many vested interests, there's almost no-one to speak up against it.

But what if we weren't subject to any of this? How could we change, and dramatically simplify, our ridiculously complex retirement system?

Because Super was a spectacularly good idea that's been, well, bastardised by successive governments ever since. So fixing it should be a priority.

And it's stupidly simple. Here's how:

First, increase the tax-free threshold for over-67s by around $20,000.

Second, make all income (earned income, unearned income, the aged pension, and Superannuation incomes) taxable above that threshold, at marginal tax rates.

Third, mandate a larger minimum withdrawal (as a % of the current balance) from Super, so it can't be used as an estate-planning tool.

Fourth? There isn't one.

That's literally it.

I would scrap the ridiculous tax dodge of 'transition to retirement' pension. And you could roll back the 30% tax rate on higher Superannuation balances, because my system would capture its taxation as income.

And the benefits? There are many:

– You wouldn't need an accountant to work this stuff out.

– The government doesn't lose a truckload of tax revenue when people use Super for estate planning or to earn an untaxed six-figure income.

– It ameliorates the cost of franking credit refunds to higher income earners, because their Super income would be taxed.

– It wouldn't disincentivise working in retirement.

(It also opens up the option of giving everyone over 67 the aged pension, should we choose, as an alternative to raising the tax-free threshold, which would save a small fortune on administration and the frictional costs of people moving in and out of work.)

Why wouldn't we do it? There's no good reason.

Oh, people who are trying to use it as a tax shield would scream blue murder. And the accountants and financial planners might lose some business.

But that's okay.

(I don't dislike those people, by the way. They do a good job. It just shouldn't be necessary to engage a financial planner to organise what otherwise should be a plain-vanilla retirement.)

It won't happen, of course. For the reasons I outlined at the top. But it should. And a Treasurer (of either/any political stripe) would do it, if he or she started from first principles, with the national interest as the foremost objective.

(By the way, according to some numbers from the Super Members Council out this morning, the cost of raiding Super during COVID could be as high as $85 billion. I called it #RetirementWrecker at the time. And since. And I'm still calling it that, now. It might just have been the worst financial policy decision of my adult lifetime.)

It's time to return Super to its original purpose, to remove the complexity and to stop it being used as a tax dodge.

Over to you, Treasurer.

Fool on!

Motley Fool contributor Scott Phillips has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Motley Fool Take Stock

A man in a suit smiles at the yellow piggy bank he holds in his hand.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Why are bank shares up so much?

While we can speculate on the answer, I’m not sure the speculation is useful.

Read more »

Model house with coins and a piggy bank.
Motley Fool Take Stock

'Housing AND Super', not 'Housing OR Super'

Yeah, but a home is more important than super, right?

Read more »

A man wearing thick rimmed black glasses and a business shirt with red suspenders sits at his desk sorting through the earnings report of Nickel Mines
Motley Fool Take Stock

One big lesson from earnings season

There is a lot to take in.

Read more »

Legendary share market investing expert and owner of Berkshire Hathaway Warren Buffett
Motley Fool Take Stock

Buffett's latest thoughts on business, investing and Berkshire

Whenever Warren Buffett speaks, or writes, I pay attention.

Read more »

Businessman working and using Digital Tablet new business project finance investment at coffee cafe.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Ignore forecasts (and guidance)

Think like a business owner, not a speculator.

Read more »

Businessman at the beach building a wall around his sandcastle, signifying protecting his business.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Invest like a Roman general

Humility is something to be cultivated in all walks of life.

Read more »

wooden block letters spelling DCA
Motley Fool Take Stock

The beauty of dollar cost averaging

Because it’s Friday. And I’m going to cover some investing fundamentals. But you knew that.

Read more »

Cubes placed on a Notebook with the letters "ETF" which stands for "Exchange traded funds".
Motley Fool Take Stock

Not all ETFs are the same… and that's a problem

ETFs are great… right?

Read more »