MENU

How to find the next 10 bagger (Part IX)

In this series of articles, I am taking a look at the history of some of the ASX’s best performing stocks. In particular, I hope to address the following questions.

  1. What did these companies look like at the start of their rise?
  2. Is it possible to identify tomorrow’s 10 baggers?

So far I have written about eight companies that have delivered exceptional returns for shareholders in recent years. In part VI, I listed four observations of the six examples I had covered to that point. Here they are, updated for all eight companies.

  1. All eight had market capitalisations of less than $100 million
  2. In six out of eight cases, board members were buying shares on market
  3. All eight companies were and still are scalable businesses with competitive advantages operating in growing markets
  4. In six out of eight cases, headline profit figures from recent reports understated the company’s ability to generate free cash

I could add other items to this list such as the tendency for the optimal buy point to be when market sentiment is very low, for example during the GFC or during sector specific depression. Also catalysts are present in some cases, for example Hansen Technologies Limited (ASX: HSN) benefited from overseas privatisation of utilities and Vita Group Limited (ASX: VTG) thrived after it started rolling out Telstra branded stores.

However, there are potential problems with drawing general rules from my observations. Here are some of them.

  1. If the sample size is too small? See the law of large numbers
  2. What if my observations are also widespread in badly performing stocks?
  3. Correlation is not causation but mechanism helps and does it always matter? For example, a director buying shares on market does not cause a business to perform well, but there are obvious reasons to think that it is a decent indicator.
  4. Some of my observations are qualitative and so are prone to bias. It may be tricky to apply them to future cases.

Despite these shortcomings, I believe there is plenty to be learned from the past. Whilst I am unable to show anything that stands up to statistical scrutiny from studying history, does that make it a fruitless exercise?

Perhaps buying and holding companies that have already proven themselves is a wiser approach to trying to catch these stocks right at the beginning of their rise. These three stocks pay fully franked dividends and offer the prospect of significant capital appreciation. Click here to learn more.

The report is free! No credit card required.

Motley Fool contributor Matt Brazier has no position in any stocks mentioned. You can follow Matt on Twitter @MatthewBrazier1

The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.

Two New Stock Picks Every Month!

Not to alarm you, but you’re about to miss a very important event! Chief Investment Advisor Scott Phillips and his team at Motley Fool Share Advisor are about to reveal their latest official stock recommendation. The premium “buy alert” will be unveiled to members and you can be among the first to act on the tip.

Don’t let this opportunity pass you by – this is your chance to get in early!

Simply enter your email now to find out how you can get instant access.

By clicking this button, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our website and about other products and services we think might interest you. You can unsubscribe from Take Stock at anytime. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information.