PS&C Ltd reports 51% increase in net profit, but is it the whole story?

Is PS&C Ltd (ASX:PSZ) being entirely transparent with shareholders and investors?

a woman

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Information technology company PS&C Ltd (ASX: PSZ) recent first half results announcement was the perfect example of corporate spin at work – and one reason why investors need to be wary.

In a two-page announcement to the ASX last week, PS&C announced that statutory net profit after tax was $3.06 million for the six months to end of December 2015, compared to the previous year of $2.03 million (a 51% gain).

The company also announced a 2.5 cents per share fully franked dividend.

Shareholders and investors reading the announcement might have been dancing for joy – given the 51% increase in net profit and the lovely dividend.

However, what the announcement didn't mention was underlying net profit, nor what the previous period's dividend was. Had the company done so, shareholders would likely have quickly abandoned ship.

You see, this time last year, PS&C announced a 3 cent dividend, so a 2.5 cent dividend this year was a cut to the dividend, despite the company reporting a supposedly 50% increase in net profit. No reason was given for the dividend cut this half year.

Other income

Alas, PS&C included $2 million in 'deferred consideration adjustments' as 'other income' – which relates to the 'review of amounts due for earn-out purposes under the share purchase and sale agreements'. In other words, PS&C has agreed to pay out a certain amount to executives/owners of a number of its acquisitions. However, this should ring alarm bells for two major reasons.

In the past, PS&C may have overestimated the amount needed to be paid out, so this adjustment appears to reflect that the company now has to pay out $2 million less than originally thought. Does this mean that the reported net profit was inflated by $2 million, which would imply that underlying net profit fell by 50%?

(Note: I've ignored acquisition expenses of $759,000 given the company also reported $418,000 of expenses last year.)

Earn-outs are usually dependent on the acquired business meeting certain financial targets. For example, when PS&C acquired Pure Hacking in August 2014, the earnout for the 2016 financial year was based on the business generating 3 times the growth in earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) between the 2015 financial year and 2016, and deferred consideration stood at $9.5 million.

Does this mean one or more of PS&C's acquisitions are not working out quite as expected?

No adjusted or underlying earnings?

Additionally, PS&C hasn't reported an 'underlying' net profit amount. Most ASX-listed companies adjust their earnings and net profit to account for one-off items and give investors a 'true' look through at the performance of the business – although there's no requirement for them to do so.

There's only one likely reason why PS&C have – because shareholders wouldn't have taken kindly to a ~50% fall in underlying net profit. Maybe the company was already feeling bad about EBIT (before one-off items) sinking 20%?

Other red flags include negative operating cash flow of $559,000 for this half compared to $1.7 million in 2015 (and much less than reported net profit) and the fact that both the Security and Communication divisions reported big falls in EBIT.

Foolish takeaway

Firstly, I'll clearly state that PS&C are absolutely not doing anything wrong here. But without reporting an underlying net profit, not explaining the $2 million 'other income' in more detail, nor why the dividend was cut, I don't think the company is being completely open with shareholders. It's also possible that I've jumped to the wrong conclusions precisely because the company hasn't been totally clear.

Investors might want to avoid companies who are not totally transparent when it comes to their financial results whether they are small or large. If revenues and profit are being bumped up by one-off items, shareholders should also be informed of what the underlying net profit is.

Motley Fool writer/analyst Mike King doesn't own shares in any companies mentioned. You can follow Mike on Twitter @TMFKinga Unless otherwise noted, the author does not have a position in any stocks mentioned by the author in the comments below. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.

More on ⏸️ Investing

Close up of baby looking puzzled
Retail Shares

What has happened to the Baby Bunting (ASX:BBN) share price this year?

It's been a volatile year so far for the Aussie nursery retailer. We take a closer look

Read more »

woman holds sign saying 'we need change' at climate change protest
ETFs

3 ASX ETFs that invest in companies fighting climate change

If you want to shift some of your investments into more ethical companies, exchange-traded funds can offer a good option

Read more »

a jewellery store attendant stands at a cabinet displaying opulent necklaces and earrings featuring diamonds and precious stones.
⏸️ Investing

The Michael Hill (ASX: MHJ) share price poised for growth

Investors will be keeping an eye on the Michael Hill International Limited (ASX: MHJ) share price today. The keen interest…

Read more »

ASX shares buy unstoppable asx share price represented by man in superman cape pointing skyward
⏸️ Investing

The Atomos (ASX:AMS) share price is up 15% in a week

The Atomos (ASX: AMS) share price has surged 15% this week. Let's look at what's ahead as the company build…

Read more »

Two people in suits arm wrestle on a black and white chess board.
Retail Shares

How does the Temple & Webster (ASX:TPW) share price stack up against Nick Scali (ASX:NCK)?

How does the Temple & Webster (ASX: TPW) share price stack up against rival furniture retailer Nick Scali Limited (ASX:…

Read more »

A medical researcher works on a bichip, indicating share price movement in ASX tech companies
Healthcare Shares

The Aroa (ASX:ARX) share price has surged 60% since its IPO

The Aroa (ASX:ARX) share price has surged 60% since the Polynovo (ASX: PNV) competitor listed on the ASX in July.…

Read more »

asx investor daydreaming about US shares
⏸️ How to Invest

How to buy US shares from Australia right now

If you have been wondering how to buy US shares from Australia to gain exposure from the highly topical market,…

Read more »

⏸️ Investing

Why Fox (NASDAQ:FOX) might hurt News Corp (ASX:NWS) shareholders

News Corporation (ASX: NWS) might be facing some existential threats from its American cousins over the riots on 6 January

Read more »