How much superannuation do Australian retirees actually need?

The amount Australians need for retirement can vary enormously, but these benchmarks provide a helpful starting point.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Knowing whether you have enough superannuation can be difficult.

Retirement could last for decades, living costs will change, and everyone's idea of a comfortable lifestyle is different.

Still, there are some useful benchmarks that can give Australians an idea of what they may want to aim for.

Elderly senior couple counting funds on calculator.

Image source: Getty Images

What does a comfortable retirement cost?

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) publishes its Retirement Standard to estimate the spending required for different retirement lifestyles.

For Australians aged 65 to 84, ASFA currently estimates that a single person needs around $55,923 a year for a comfortable retirement. A couple needs approximately $78,566 annually.

That comfortable budget allows for things such as private health insurance, regular leisure activities, occasional restaurant meals, maintaining a reasonable car, home repairs, and some travel.

The figures are a lot lower for what ASFA describes as a modest retirement.

A single homeowner needs an estimated $36,434 annually, while a couple needs $52,473. Private renters face a higher hurdle, with estimated annual spending of $51,164 for a single person and $69,002 for a couple.

That difference shows why the amount of superannuation someone needs can vary so much depending on their circumstances.

So, how much superannuation is enough?

ASFA has helpfully provided its estimate for the superannuation balances required at age 67 to fund those lifestyles.

For a comfortable retirement, it estimates that a single person needs around $630,000, while a couple needs approximately $730,000 between them.

It is important to point out that this does not assume retirees will live entirely from investment income while preserving their original balance forever.

ASFA's calculations assume retirees draw down their capital over retirement and receive a part Age Pension.

For a modest retirement, ASFA estimates required balances of $110,000 for a single homeowner and $120,000 for a couple.

Private renters need more. ASFA puts the required balance at around $340,000 for a single renter and $385,000 for a couple.

I would treat these as a starting point

I do not think there is one superannuation number that every Australian should aim for.

Someone who owns their home outright, has relatively low expenses, and qualifies for the Age Pension could need considerably less than someone paying rent or wanting to travel regularly.

Retirement age also makes a difference. The ASFA balance estimates are based on retiring at 67, so someone hoping to finish work much earlier may need to fund more years before or during retirement.

I would also want some room for unexpected expenses rather than planning around the minimum amount required to make the numbers work.

Foolish takeaway

ASFA's latest benchmark suggests a single Australian needs around $630,000 in superannuation at age 67 for a comfortable retirement, while a couple needs around $730,000.

That gives investors something tangible to work towards, but I would not treat it as a universal target.

The amount I would want would ultimately depend on when I planned to retire, whether I owned my home, the lifestyle I wanted, and how much flexibility I wanted once regular employment income stopped.

Motley Fool contributor Grace Alvino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Superannuation

Two elderly people smiling with their fists pumping and with a cape on.
Superannuation

How much is needed in superannuation to target a $70,000 annual passive income?

Investors can unlock tens of thousands of dollars in dividends through superannuation.

Read more »

Elder woman typing on her laptop.
Superannuation

Could a $1 million superannuation balance provide $50,000 a year in retirement?

I would want this retirement portfolio to generate income today while still providing enough growth for the decades ahead.

Read more »

An older couple use a calculator to work out what money they have to spend.
Superannuation

How much passive income can I earn off a $550,000 superannuation balance?

How much could your super realistically generate?

Read more »

Australian dollar notes in a nest, symbolising a nest egg.
Superannuation

How much passive income can I earn off a $750,000 superannuation balance?

Investing in quality ASX dividend shares can provide a reliable annual passive income stream.

Read more »

Happy woman standing in front of a house with a pen and clipboard.
Superannuation

Rates are rising again. Should you pay down your mortgage or top up your superannuation?

The answer changes with your tax rate.

Read more »

Woman using her laptop with her feet up.
Superannuation

Superannuation just had a fourth straight year of gains. Can it continue?

Four good years, one very narrow driver.

Read more »

Wife hugging husband, with both smiling.
Superannuation

How much passive income could a $500,000 superannuation balance generate?

I think a diversified portfolio could help turn this balance into a sustainable source of retirement income.

Read more »

Australian dollar notes in the pocket of a man's jeans, symbolising dividends.
Superannuation

How much is needed in superannuation for $3,000 in weekly passive income?

Let's have a look at how the numbers stack up.

Read more »