VGS vs IVV: Which ASX ETF is better?

I would be happy owning either ETF for the next decade, but one stands out.

The Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (ASX: VGS) and the iShares S&P 500 AUD ETF (ASX: IVV) are two of the most popular ASX exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for investors wanting international exposure.

I think both could be excellent long-term holdings.

The tricky part is that they are not as different as they may first appear. The VGS ETF has a large weighting to US shares, which means there is plenty of overlap with the IVV ETF.

Even so, there are some important differences.

A girl sits on her bed in her room while using laptop and listening to headphones.

Image source: Getty Images

The case for the IVV ETF

The IVV ETF gives investors exposure to the S&P 500.

That means investors are buying a slice of 500 large US-listed companies across technology, healthcare, financials, consumer goods, industrials, communications, and more.

For me, the appeal is the sheer quality and depth of the US market.

The S&P 500 has produced an average annual return of around 10% over the very long term. That is not guaranteed to continue, but it is an outstanding track record.

The US market has also been very good at producing world-leading companies. Many of today's most important businesses in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, software, digital advertising, payments, and consumer technology are listed in the United States.

That makes the IVV ETF a very simple way to access a powerful long-term growth engine.

It is not risk-free. US shares can become expensive, technology exposure can be high, and currency movements can affect Australian investors.

But if I wanted one clean, simple global growth ETF, the IVV ETF would be hard to beat.

The case for the VGS ETF

The VGS ETF takes a broader approach.

It still gives investors plenty of exposure to US shares, so investors are not missing out on many of the world's largest technology, healthcare, and consumer businesses. But it also reaches beyond the United States into other developed markets.

That means investors get exposure to companies listed in places such as Japan, the UK, France, Switzerland, Germany, the Netherlands, and Canada.

For example, the VGS ETF can provide access to global leaders that are not part of the S&P 500, such as LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, ASML, and Nestle.

I can see the appeal of that.

The world's best companies are not all listed in the United States, and the VGS ETF gives investors a more diversified way to invest internationally.

Which one would I choose?

This is a close call. If I could only buy one today, I would choose the IVV ETF.

The S&P 500's long-term record, the strength of US corporate earnings, and the number of world-class companies inside the index make it my preferred option.

But I do not think this is a one-size-fits-all answer.

The VGS ETF could be the better choice for investors who want broader developed-market diversification. It may also suit investors who prefer not to have so much of their international exposure tied to one country.

Foolish takeaway

I would not lose sleep owning either of these ETFs for the next decade.

The IVV ETF is my pick because I think the S&P 500 remains one of the best long-term wealth-building markets in the world.

But the VGS ETF solves a different problem. It gives investors a wider developed-market footprint and reduces the need to rely so heavily on the United States.

Motley Fool contributor Grace Alvino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended ASML and iShares S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended Lvmh Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Nestlé. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended ASML, Vanguard Msci Index International Shares ETF, and iShares S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Man sits smiling at a computer showing graphs.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Are NDQ and these Betashares ETFs buys for Australian investors?

These three funds give investors three different ways to pursue long-term wealth creation.

Read more »

Cheerful boyfriend showing mobile phone to girlfriend with a coffee mug in dining room.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Why I rate these Vanguard ETFs as strong buys for 2027

These three funds offer different ways to invest in long-term global growth.

Read more »

Four investors stand in a line holding cash fanned in their hands with thoughtful looks on their faces.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Why VEU and these ASX ETFs could be top buys

Here's what you need to know about these leading funds.

Read more »

Businesswoman working with laptop and documents in office, with virtual finance related graphs and charts.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Is it a smart idea to invest $10,000 into the VAS ETF?

I look at whether this low-cost Vanguard ETF makes sense as a long-term portfolio holding.

Read more »

Senior couple enjoying each other's company while walking on the beach.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Could $750,000 in ASX ETFs fund a comfortable retirement?

I crunch the numbers to see whether this ETF portfolio could fund a comfortable retirement.

Read more »

Happy man holding Australian dollar notes, representing dividends.
Dividend Investing

ASX ETF investors will receive dividends today. Here is how much you'll get

Own Global X ETFs such as A300, ZYAU, BANK, or OZXX? It's payday!

Read more »

Two work colleagues looking at a laptop and discussing something.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Buy and hold these top ASX ETFs until 2036

Here are three funds that could be worth looking at for the next decade.

Read more »

Mid-aged couple looking at a laptop.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Why I'd invest $5,000 into these Betashares ETFs

These three funds offer different ways to build long-term wealth.

Read more »