Why this ASX defence ETF keeps attracting investor attention

The Betashares Global Defence ETF holds 60 of the world's top defence contractors. Here's why this ASX defence ETF keeps attracting investor attention.

| More on:

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Defence budgets are rising at a pace not seen since the Cold War.

Yet for Australian investors wanting exposure to the theme, picking individual defence stocks can be complex, costly, and risky.

The Betashares Global Defence ETF (ASX: ARMR) offers a simpler way to gain exposure to the defence industry in a cost-effective way.

A child dressed in army clothes looks through his binoculars with leaves and branches on his head.

Image source: Getty Images

What ARMR actually holds

ARMR tracks the VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index, providing exposure to 60 companies that derive more than 50% of their revenues from the development and manufacturing of military and defence equipment and technology.

Critically, the fund only holds companies headquartered in NATO member and major NATO ally countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, Japan, and South Korea.

Top holdings include some of the most recognisable names in global defence: Lockheed Martin, Palantir Technologies, BAE Systems, and Rheinmetall.

In fact, ARMR currently holds 13 of the top 20 defence contractors in the world by defence revenue, giving investors meaningful concentration in the companies that win the largest government contracts.

The performance backdrop

ARMR has delivered healthy returns over the past twelve months, reflecting the extraordinary surge in global defence spending these last years.

However, as Betashares recently noted in its own research, the fund has returned negative 1.8% over the past six months despite the spending environment remaining exceptionally strong.

This has created what the fund manager described as a counterintuitive divergence between the operational backdrop and near-term price performance.

Tom Wickenden, investment strategist at Betashares, said the first 12 days of the US conflict with Iran alone are estimated to have cost the US around US$16.5 billion.

This is a reminder of how quickly modern conflict depletes equipment and drives reordering.

In response, the US is planning a defence budget of around US$1.5 trillion for FY2027, which would represent the most significant year-on-year defence budget increase in history if approved.

The investment case

The case for an ASX defence ETF like ARMR rests on a simple but powerful observation: the shift in global defence spending is not a one-year event.

Europe's defence procurement backlog will take years to clear.

NATO members are only beginning to reach the 2% of GDP spending target.

Australia's own defence budget is expanding under the AUKUS agreement, with the federal government committing to reach 2.4% of GDP within a decade.

For investors who want diversified, low-cost exposure to this theme without the risk of picking individual stocks, ARMR remains the most direct option available on the ASX.

Foolish takeaway

ARMR is not without risk.

Defence spending can be cyclical and the near-term price performance has been softer than the underlying spending environment might suggest.

Nevertheless, for long-term investors who believe elevated defence budgets are here to stay, this ASX defence ETF continues to make a strong case.

Motley Fool contributor Mark Verhoeven has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended Lockheed Martin and Rheinmetall. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Index investing

Statue of Liberty with the American flag in the background.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Is the Vanguard US Total Market ETF (VTS) the best buy for investing in America?

Is this a case of 'some shares good, more shares better'?

Read more »

Two kids are selling big ideas from a lemonade stand on the side of the road for cheap!
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

15% for 10 years: Is this ASX ETF a no-brainer buy?

Are these numbers too good to be true?

Read more »

A geeky-looking young man with glasses bites down onto a computer keyboard in frustration or despair.
Index investing

20% a year: Is this the ASX's best index fund?

This simple index fund is beating Buffett's long-term return.

Read more »

A man in his office leans back in his chair with his hands behind his head looking out his window at the city.
How to invest

The simple investing strategy anyone can use to get rich

Anyone can use this simple recipe to grow richer.

Read more »

A businesswoman looks unhappy while she flies a red flag at her laptop.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Buying ASX ETFs? Watch out for this red flag

You need to check this number before buying your next ETF.

Read more »

A boy stands in front of two similar but slightly different doors, scratching his head as to which one to choose.
Index investing

VAS vs VSO: Do small-cap stocks beat the ASX 300?

Vanguard's most popular ETFs are tough to choose between.

Read more »

ETF on a cube with a green and red arrow on another cube.
Index investing

Buying the Vanguard Australian Shares ETF (VAS)? There's a big change you should know about

VAS has more banks and miners than ever.

Read more »

A graphic showing a businessman running up a white upwards rising arrow symbolising the soaring Magellan share price today
Index investing

Meet the simple ASX index fund up 220% in 12 months

How are these returns even possible?

Read more »