Why the Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF (VTS) is a top long-term buy

I view the VTS ETF as one of the leading funds Aussies can buy.

Few funds can compete with Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF (ASX: VTS) for the title of best ASX exchange-traded fund (ETF), in my opinion.

When choosing an ETF to invest in, I'm looking for low fees, diversification and good returns. This fund, which provides exposure to a large array of US shares, looks very appealing to me.

There are several diversified ETFs that I'd be extremely happy to own including VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (ASX: MOAT), Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF (ASX: QLTY), VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (ASX: QUAL) and BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ASX: ETHI). But the VTS ETF arguably ticks the most boxes.

Let's examine how Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF rates on each of the factors I'm looking for.

Businessman using a digital tablet with a graphical chart, symbolising the stock market.

Image source: Getty Images

Low fees

In terms of annual costs, this is the cheapest shares ETF that Aussies can buy on the ASX.

According to Vanguard, the yearly fee is a very minimal 0.03%.

In contrast, an active fund manager typically charges an annual fee of, say, 1% and then performance fees if they outperform their benchmark. The VTS ETF fund does not charge performance fees — it simply tracks the return of the US share market.  

Diversification

The Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF has a total of more than 3,700 holdings. There are few ASX ETFs that provide as much exposure to that many businesses in a single fund.

Having this many holdings reduces the risk of being invested too much in one particular business.

I also like the level of sector allocation diversification. The technology sector has typically been the best-performing industry over the past decade because of its high margins and fast revenue growth.

Around a third of the VTS ETF is invested in technology shares, with consumer discretionary (14%), industrials (13.1%), healthcare (11.8%) and financials (10.9%) being the other sectors with a weighting of over 10%.

Good returns

While past performance is not a guarantee of future performance, the VTS ETF has done very well thanks to its biggest holdings driving the US share market higher.

I'm talking about some of the largest stocks in the world: Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon.com, Meta Platforms and Berkshire Hathaway. These are high-quality businesses with extremely powerful market positions and the ability to re-invest for a high return within the business. This quality helps the VTS ETF deliver returns for investors.

In the 10 years to 31 May 2024, the Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF has delivered an average annual return of 15.9%.

I can't predict its level of return over the next 10 years, but its heavy weighting to strong technology stocks makes me believe the VTS ETF can continue outperforming the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) over the long term.

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

A young investor working on his ASX shares portfolio on his laptop.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Why I'd invest $5,000 in this Vanguard ETF

I think this fund offers a simple way to invest across several major technology trends.

Read more »

Couple using their digital tablet together.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

10 top ASX ETFs to watch in 2027

These funds offer exposure to some major themes and quality stocks.

Read more »

Numerous Australian dollar notes laid out.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

How many VAS ETF shares do I need to buy for $10,000 per year of passive income?

Want passive income and passive growth? This is the ETF for you.

Read more »

Person holding Australian dollar notes, symbolising dividends.
Dividend Investing

Own VAS, VHY, VGS, or other Vanguard ETFs? Here's your next dividend

Vanguard has announced the next lot of distributions for its ASX ETFs.

Read more »

Magnifying glass on semiconductor chip.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Want to invest in AI? Here are the best ASX ETFs for 2027

Let's talk AI ETFs on the ASX.

Read more »

Couple on their laptop in their home kitchen.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

3 reasons I'd invest $10,000 into the NDQ ETF

I think this ETF offers something quite different from a typical Australian share portfolio.

Read more »

Happy businessman fist pumping while looking at a tablet.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

5 ASX ETFs for Aussie investors to buy and hold for 20 years

Here's how to build wealth the easy way with ETFs.

Read more »

A mature aged man with grey hair and glasses holds a fan of Australian hundred dollar bills up against his mouth and looks skywards with his eyes as though he is thinking what he might do with the cash.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

Here are the most popular ASX share superannuation investments in SMSFs

How does your SMSF compare?

Read more »