Is the NDQ ETF a no-brainer buy right now?

We check the credentials of this ETF for long-term investors today

| More on:

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Key points
  • The NDQ ETF has delivered some impressive returns in recent years
  • But this ETF has also slumped hard in 2022 thus far
  • So does this mean NDQ is a no-brainer buy? Well, it's not that simple...

These are two metrics that might sugggest that the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX: NDQ) is a no-brainer buy for a long-term investor's share portfolio today.

The first is its long-term performance record. Over the past five years, this exchange traded fund (ETF) has delivered an impressive average return of 18.22% per annum. Since its inception in May 2015, NDQ has averaged 16.6% per annum.

Considering an ASX-based index fund like the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS) has averaged just 6.88% per annum over the past five years, NDQ investors might feel rather grateful they had branched out from ASX shares over the timeframe.

The second metric is the steep drop NDQ units have suffered over 2022 thus far. It has been a rather brutal year to date for the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF. Between 1 January and 30 June 2022, NDQ units have lost a painful 25.4%.

So we have a long-term performer that has just suffered a major dip. Some investors might see the perfect mix here for a 'buy the dip' opportunity. But is it as simple as that?

Woman sits at computer in a quandary with hands at side of head

Image source: Getty Images

Is it buy the dip time for the NASDAQ 100 ETF?

The NASDAQ 100 ETF is an index fund at the end of the day. It covers the 100 largest shares on the US Nasdaq Composite (INDEXNASDAQ: .IXIC). Yes, the NASDAQ has had a golden decade of sorts, driven largely by the stellar returns of the FAANG stocks such as Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL), Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN), and Aphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL).

But we have seen periods of immense returns for the NASDAQ before. Between March 1992 and March 2000, the NASDAQ appreciated by more than 700%. That's almost twice the gain that the NASDAQ experienced over the eight years to November 2021.

But here's what investors should remember. The NASDAQ also lost around 75% of its value between March 2000 and March 2003. It would take until March 2015 for the NASDAQ to recover to the heights we saw in the dot-com peak of March 2000.

I'm not suggesting this will happen again. But what I am suggesting is that an investment can look like a no-brainer if we look at a five-year performance chart. But it's only after we zoom out and get the fuller picture that past patterns can really be appreciated.

There is one big difference between 2000 and today though. Back in 2000, the NASDAQ was full of companies that had yet to become profitable. Today, the NASDAQ is dominated by some of the most profitable companies in the world. For that reason, I still think the BetaSahres NASDAQ 100 ETF is a no-brainer buy today for a long-term investor.

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has positions in Alphabet (A shares), Amazon, and Apple. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, Apple, and BETANASDAQ ETF UNITS. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended the following options: long March 2023 $120 calls on Apple and short March 2023 $130 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended BETANASDAQ ETF UNITS. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, and Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on ETFs

Young woman using computer laptop smiling in love showing heart symbol and shape with hands. as she switches from a big telco to Aussie Broadband which is capturing more market share
ETFs

3 quality ASX ETFs to buy and hold until 2036

These funds could be well-placed to generate strong returns in the future.

Read more »

Man putting in a coin in a coin jar with piles of coins next to it.
ETFs

New to ASX ETFs? These 4 products could be a good start

ETF investing has become hugely popular.

Read more »

A smiling young couple sit with a finance professional at a computer, looking at the screen.
ETFs

3 Betashares ETFs that I'd buy with $2,500

I would want a mix of growth, quality, and long-term relevance from a small group of Betashares ETFs.

Read more »

A man sits cross-legged in a zen pose on top of his desk as papers fly around his head, keeping calm amid the volatility.
Share Market News

What $500 a month in ASX ETFs looks like in 10 years

Boring, automatic, and relentless. That's how most everyday wealth actually gets built.

Read more »

Group of young people stacking hands together in an outdoor setting. A community of multiracial international people supporting each other.
ETFs

5 ASX ETFs for beginners with $500

These funds could be worth getting acquainted with if you are new to the share market.

Read more »

A boy stands firm on a rocky cliff holding a rocket in each hand and looking up toward the sky, anticipating flying into space.
ETFs

SpaceX IPO: Should you buy an ASX space ETF to cash in?

The countdown is on.

Read more »

Man on a tablet in a room with data centre technology.
ETFs

2 ASX ETFs positioned for the booming AI data centre buildout

Here's a lower-risk way to own the foundations of the AI buildout.

Read more »

A picture of a satellite orbiting the earth.
ETFs

Are space ASX ETFs the next big growth opportunity or overhyped?

Should investors be buying the hype?

Read more »