Have you ever thought about the type of language that’s used in the finance sector? Without having to think too hard it’s easy to come up with a number of some traditionally masculine examples, such as “building” a portfolio, the ASX “fighting” its way upward, watching a share or stock market “tank”, then there’s dawn raids, Death Star IPOs, Samurai bonds, scalping, whipsaws and kill orders, to name a few.
A study published by Tilburg University in the Netherlands in 2015 found that the language and metaphors in investor communication come from the same source domains which include war and combat, heavy physical activity and building and construction.
Now, this is definitely not to say that men like war, or that women don’t like sports and physical activity. Masculine language in finance is a product of legacy. It wasn’t so long ago that women worked only if they were not married. In the past, it was sons, not daughters that inherited a family’s wealth. In fact, if you go back to Jane Austen’s time, the only investment decision made by upper-class women was in choosing a wealthy bachelor to marry. It’s not so strange then that finance, a typically masculine sector, would use some typically masculine language.
The Dutch study also found that this kind of language works to exclude, rather than include women investors. It is a fact that women participate less in the stock market than men, and if they do, they generally take less risk. This gender gap in financial decision-making is often explained due to differences in risk tolerance and financial literacy, but the gap can also increasingly be attributed to the degree to which men and women identify with the language used in the finance sector. While masculine financial language works to exclude women, the study also suggested it creates feelings of familiarity and belonging among men.
Language and the way products are marketed are important drivers of inclusion and exclusion. A good example of this was the changes in marketing tack by both PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ: PEP) and The Coca-Cola Co (NYSE: KO) in the way they marketed their diet soft drink products in the 1990s and 2000s. Marketers found that amongst male consumers, the word “diet” evoked images of the world of women and brought to mind the idea of fitting clothes and spending time in front of a mirror, so Pepsi Max and Coke Zero were born.
Due to increased female labour market participation and changes in socio-demographics, women as much as men are involved in taking care of their finances. So, could there be a time in the future where we knit or weave our portfolios rather than build them? Or perhaps a more gender-neutral financial language will emerge. Only time will tell.
Where to invest $1,000 right now
When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool Share Advisor newsletter he has run for more than eight years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
Scott just revealed what he believes are the five best ASX stocks for investors to buy right now. These stocks are trading at dirt-cheap prices and Scott thinks they are great buys right now.
*Returns as of June 30th
Motley Fool contributor Bronwyn Bruce has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
- The legacy of language in the finance sector – October 17, 2018 12:32pm
- Nike share price reaches all time high on back of Kaepernick campaign – September 14, 2018 1:14pm
- Why women are risk aware when it comes to investing in the stock market – September 10, 2018 10:25am