SMSFs not responsible for housing bubble

Morgan Stanley Australia chief executive Steve Harker has joined the growing chorus of commentators echoing the belief that self-managed super funds are going berserk borrowing funds to invest in property.

In an interview with the Australian Financial Review (AFR), Mr Harker says low interest rates boost the appeal of real assets – such as property, and the newspaper reports that he is deeply worried that Australia is sowing the seeds of its next financial crisis, by allowing people to borrow money in their SMSFs to buy property. Mr Harker claims $200 billion in superannuation savings could be blown up thanks to unviable property schemes, spruikers and promoters.

But according to the Australian Tax Office’s (ATO) SMSF Statistical June 2013 report, SMSFs held just $17.5 billion in residential property. Many SMSFs are setup by small business owners, and the SMSF is used to purchase commercial property, such as the land and property owned by the business. $58.6 billion is invested in non-residential real property, four times more than in residential.

Given Australia’s total residential property market is valued at $4.9 trillion, according to RPData’s Capital Market report – Spring 2013, SMSF investment in residential property represents just 3% of the total market. Additionally, in August 2013, a presenter at the SMSF Professionals Association of Australia conference estimated that SMSF had borrowings of around $6-$7 billion, hardly the $200 billion Mr Harker cites.

Low mortgage rates of around 5% offered by the likes of the big four banks, ANZ Bank (ASX: ANZ), Commonwealth Bank (ASX: CBA), National Australia Bank (ASX: NAB) and Westpac Banking Corporation (ASX: WBC), may have spurred an increase in investment in property since June 2013. But it appears that based on the data, SMSFs do not have hundreds of billions of dollars at risk in residential property.

Foolish takeaway

What is a concern raised by Mr Harker is that Australians can have a triple play exposure to residential property, through their own home, their SMSF as well as outside their SMSF. If the property market were to crash, that could see many Australians lose their life savings, particularly if they are heavily exposed to residential property. The lesson for investors and SMSF trustees is to consider how diversified their investments are, both inside and outside super as a whole.

Want an alternative to bank stocks that pays a decent fully-franked dividend?

Discover The Motley Fool's favourite income idea for 2013-2014 in our brand-new, FREE research report, including a full investment analysis! Simply click here for your FREE copy of "The Motley Fool's Top Dividend Stock for 2013-2014."


Motley Fool writer/analyst Mike King doesn’t own shares in any companies mentioned. You can follow Mike on Twitter @TMFKinga

Two New Stock Picks Every Month!

Not to alarm you, but you’re about to miss a very important event! Chief Investment Advisor Scott Phillips and his team at Motley Fool Share Advisor are about to reveal their latest official stock recommendation. The premium “buy alert” will be unveiled to members and you can be among the first to act on the tip.

Don’t let this opportunity pass you by – this is your chance to get in early!

Simply enter your email now to find out how you can get instant access.

By clicking this button, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our website and about other products and services we think might interest you. You can unsubscribe from Take Stock at anytime. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information.