If you were paying $20 billion a year in fees, you’d want some pretty good financial performance. Unfortunately, we may not be getting what we are paying for.
Research by Roy Morgan suggests investors with their own self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) are much happier with their funds’ financial performance, than investors in retail or industry funds.
According to the research, 64% of investors in SMSFs are happy with their performance, compared to just 48.9% in industry super funds and a lowly 42.5% in retail funds. Poor investment performance and the level of fees and charges is the major reason that people are switching out of retail and industry funds.
It has been regularly noted that at least 70% of super funds fail to beat their benchmarks, and that’s before fees. Add that to the poor performance of global stockmarkets over the past five years, and it’s no surprise that investors have become disillusioned with their managed funds. A recent report commissioned by the Industry Super Network found fund members are paying around $20 billion in fees each year, with $6.2 billion of that going to fund managers.
A lack of transparency when it comes to fees, wages and bonuses paid to fund managers, and being charged a fee based on the amount of funds you have invested are all issues the industry needs to address. In fact, several industry super funds are pushing for fund managers to publish more information, and that they should have the same level of disclosure as the funds themselves.
For listed fund managers like Perpetual Limited (ASX: PPT), BT Investment Management (ASX: BTT), Platinum Asset Management (ASX: PTM) or K2 Asset Management (ASX: KAM), there’s much more information available, but many funds aren’t listed, or are part of a larger organisation such as the big four banks and AMP.
SMSFs now control more than 30% of the total $1.4 trillion invested in Australian superannuation funds, according to the latest data released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). That share is likely to rise in future if the trend continues, which could trigger consolidation, lower fees and greater transparency in the funds management industry.
Bring it on I say.
If you only invest in one company this year, make it our “Top Stock for 2012-13”. Operating in two hot markets — one set to double by 2012, the other predicted to grow 5x over the next five years — this stock is a solid growth play that also boasts strong recurring revenue, zero debt, and lots of cash. Get its name and full research case in this brand-new FREE report.
- Car trouble: Handouts not the answer
- Is this the start of a retail recovery?
- Should you buy SCA, Woolworths’ property fund?
- White paper: Our future is Asia
- A lottery you always win
Motley Fool writer/analyst Mike King doesn’t own shares in any companies mentioned. The Motley Fool’s purpose is to help the world invest, better. Take Stock is The Motley Fool’s free investing newsletter. Packed with stock ideas and investing advice, it is essential reading for anyone looking to build and grow their wealth in the years ahead. Click here now to request your free subscription, whilst it’s still available. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.
- Why PWR Holdings Ltd could see its share price rise from here – July 21, 2017 12:11pm
- Fortescue Metals Group Limited share price sinks on native title decision – July 20, 2017 4:23pm
- 5 overlooked finance shares to add to your watchlist – July 20, 2017 2:33pm