Well, I did it. I bought shares today

Want to know why I was buying today? Here's my simple answer…

a woman

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Well, I did it.

wrote yesterday that I was planning to buy shares today.

And, while I gave myself the (legitimate) 'out' of not absolutely promising to do it, I went ahead.

Why?

Not because I knew this was the bottom for stocks.

For all I know they'll fall again tomorrow, Friday and all next week.

Or, they'll rise.

Not much of an 'expert' am I?

Depends how you define it.

See, the 'experts' said there'd be a double-dip recession in 2010.

The 'experts' at RBS said 'Sell Everything' in 2016.

The 'experts' at Goldman Sachs said the US market would rise 7% in 2019. They were only out by a factor of 4.

Pundits, as John Kenneth Galbraith noted, "forecast not because they know, but because they are asked."

Which raises (or should raise) the question: If you don't have a forecast, how can you know it's worth buying shares?

A 'forecast' implies a target. Some expected, measurable event at some future point.

That's how we get some people issuing 'price targets' for shares, and 'year end targets' for the ASX (among others).

Me?

I have no idea where shares will be by year end.

Because share prices, in the short term, are a measure not of value, but of popularity.

I've seen enough reality television (which, by definition, is any amount of time above zero) to know that predicting human behaviour is a thankless and all-but impossible task, at least in the short term.

But in the long term? Ah, that's a different kettle of fish.

Want to know why I was buying today?

The simplest answer I can give you is "I think today's share prices undervalue the long term earnings power of those businesses".

Think Coronavirus is going to permanently damage a business? You'd better pay less for the shares.

Think Coronavirus is serious, and disruptive, but its effects will be transitory? Great; take advantage of others' pessimism and buy!

That's what I did today.

Not because I knew share prices would automatically and suddenly start rising tomorrow.

And not just because share prices were lower than at some point in the past. After all, plenty of companies' shares fell… then fell… then fell, never to recover. Buying just because prices are down is silly.

But I bought because I expect the prices I paid, for quality businesses, will be attractive when viewed against the long term profit-generating potential of the companies whose shares I bought.

They might go down further in the near term.

Or not.

I have no idea. Neither do you.

And it really doesn't matter.

What matters is what the company is worth over the long term.

And it's not just me saying that. I'll leave you with a couple of quotes. The first is from wildly successful US fund manager and author, Peter Lynch:

"I don't believe in predicting markets. I believe in buying great companies — especially companies that are undervalued, and/or under appreciated."

And from Warren Buffett:

"I am not in the business of predicting general stock market or business fluctuations. If you think I can do this, or think it is essential to an investment program, you should not be in the partnership."

He wrote that in 1966, by the way. Long before his phenomenal multi-decade investment performance made him the greatest investor to have lived.

Today, I narrowed my search down to a few companies that are attractively priced, compared to their long term future earning potential.

So I bought them.

Investing doesn't need to be any harder than that.

Fool on!

Motley Fool contributor Scott Phillips has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

More on Motley Fool Take Stock

a man lies on his back on grass with his eyes shut and a contented look on his face as though he is dreaming
Motley Fool Take Stock

I don't care about my portfolio's performance this year

Want to hear something unusual… and a little strange?

Read more »

A young boy laughs with his grandpa as he puts a fishing net over his head.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Trading? Go fishing, instead.

Of all of the things an 11 year-old can become obsessed with, I’ll take fishing any day!

Read more »

surprised shopper, unexpected news, person at computer with payment card,
Motley Fool Take Stock

Afterpay increasing credit limits… what could go wrong?

At the risk of being called Grandpa, I’m from the ‘spend what you can afford or have already saved’ camp.

Read more »

a man sits at his computer screen scrolling with his fingers with a satisfied smile on his face as though he is very content with the news he is receiving.
Motley Fool Take Stock

I wish I'd known this decades ago

What would I tell my younger self?

Read more »

A little girl wearing a gold crown sulks and pokes her tongue out.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Alchemy? Nah, Fool's gold, instead!

We hope you enjoyed our little joke.

Read more »

A man in a suit smiles at the yellow piggy bank he holds in his hand.
Motley Fool Take Stock

Why are bank shares up so much?

While we can speculate on the answer, I’m not sure the speculation is useful.

Read more »

Model house with coins and a piggy bank.
Motley Fool Take Stock

'Housing AND Super', not 'Housing OR Super'

Yeah, but a home is more important than super, right?

Read more »

A man wearing thick rimmed black glasses and a business shirt with red suspenders sits at his desk sorting through the earnings report of Nickel Mines
Motley Fool Take Stock

One big lesson from earnings season

There is a lot to take in.

Read more »