<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:company="http:/purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/company" xmlns:fool="https://fool.com/rss/extensions"     >

    <channel>
        <title>Herve Blandin, Author at The Motley Fool Australia</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.fool.com.au/author/herve-blandin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.fool.com.au/author/herve-blandin/</link>
        <description>Since 1993, millions of investors have trusted The Motley Fool for simple, down-to-earth investing research.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-AU</language>
                <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
                <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>

 
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>
<atom:link rel="self" href="https://www.fool.com.au/author/herve-blandin/feed/"/>
            <item>
                                <title>Should investors welcome Zoom&#039;s $14.7 billion deal?</title>
                <link>https://www.fool.com.au/2021/07/21/should-investors-welcome-zooms-14-7-billion-deal-usfeed/</link>
                                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Herve Blandin]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[International Stock News]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/20/should-investors-welcome-zooms-147-billion-deal/</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>The videoconferencing specialist agreed to acquire contact center outfit Five9.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/2021/07/21/should-investors-welcome-zooms-14-7-billion-deal-usfeed/">Should investors welcome Zoom&#039;s $14.7 billion deal?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.fool.com.au">The Motley Fool Australia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                                                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="700" height="394" src="https://www.fool.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/zoom-16_9-.jpg" class="attachment-rss-thumbnail size-rss-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="woman chatting to work colleagues via zoom" style="float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" /><p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/20/should-investors-welcome-zooms-147-billion-deal/?source=ifa74cs0000001&#038;utm_source=global&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=article">Fool.com</a>. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.</em></p>
<strong>Zoom Video Communications</strong> <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/tickers/nasdaq-zm/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span class="ticker" data-id="341090">(NASDAQ: ZM)</span></a> announced last Sunday a definitive agreement to acquire the contact-center specialist <strong>Five9</strong> <span class="ticker" data-id="288984">(NASDAQ: FIVN)</span> in a $14.7 billion all-stock transaction.

Should investors welcome such a large deal? Let's take a closer look.
<h2>Not a surprise</h2>
Zoom's foray into contact centers shouldn't surprise investors. During the company's latest earnings call, CEO Eric Yuan had commented on potential new developments in the contact center arena. Indeed, the company can develop synergies and cross-selling opportunities with call-center capabilities it can offer to enterprise customers.

So far, Zoom had been partnering with various contact-center vendors, including Five9, to enhance its services, allowing enterprises to better manage communications with their customers.

In contrast with legacy on-premises solutions that require clients to host and manage their own call-center infrastructure, Five9 provides those capabilities via the cloud. That gives users much more flexibility to manage and scale this part of their business. And because it's hosted in the cloud, Five9's offering is a natural complement to Zoom's platform.

During a conference call in March, Yuan even highlighted the seamless combination between Five9 and Zoom's cloud-based products, so this deal makes sense. Zoom can now provide customers with an integrated solution.

In addition, the acquisition will expand Zoom's addressable market from $62 billion to at least $86 billion, according to management. While you should take these exact estimates with a grain of salt, it's clear Zoom's growth opportunities will be expanding further.
<h2>About that price tag ...</h2>
However, with a $14.7 billion price tag that amounts to about 31 times Five9's trailing-12-month revenue, did Zoom pay too much?

Granted, Five9 recently reported impressive results. For instance, revenue increased 45% year over year to $138 million during the first quarter as enterprises have been migrating their legacy on-premises contact centers to the cloud. And management raised its full-year revenue outlook to $550 million (at the midpoint), which corresponds to 26% growth over 2020.

But the agreed-upon deal is already pricing in these kinds of results over many years. In addition, with increased investments to fuel its growth, Five9 recorded a net loss of $12.3 million during the last quarter, compared to $7.4 million in the prior-year period.

Interestingly, Zoom didn't leverage its rock-solid balance sheet to finance the transaction (by the end of its fiscal 2022 first quarter, it had accumulated $4.7 billion of cash and equivalents). Instead, the companies agreed to an all-stock deal, which is a smart choice for Zoom as it takes advantage of the strong currency its stock represents.

Indeed, thanks to the company's phenomenal performance over the last several quarters, boosted by the need for remote communications during <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/category/coronavirus-news/">coronavirus</a>-induced lockdowns, Zoom stock is up more than 400% since the beginning of last year. It currently trades at a similarly high price-to-sales ratio of 32.
<h2>Looking forward</h2>
It remains to be seen how this combination will play out with Five9 and Zoom's existing partners. In a blog post, Yuan said Zoom will still support other contact-center solutions, and I don't see any difficulty here.

In contrast, the integration of Five9's products with other communication platforms may be at risk as competitors might want to avoid fueling Zoom's growth. For instance, <strong>Microsoft</strong> could prioritize the support of other contact-center providers for its Microsoft Teams platform.

In any case, considering Zoom's history of strong execution, investors should welcome the deal, which is expected to close during the first half of next year (subject to various approval by shareholders and regulators). The combination should offer a sizable boost to Zoom's long-term growth potential.
<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/20/should-investors-welcome-zooms-147-billion-deal/?source=ifa74cs0000001&#038;utm_source=global&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=article">Fool.com</a>. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.</em></p><p>The post <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/2021/07/21/should-investors-welcome-zooms-14-7-billion-deal-usfeed/">Should investors welcome Zoom&#039;s $14.7 billion deal?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.fool.com.au">The Motley Fool Australia</a>.</p>
<div class="ad-container">
<h2>Wondering where to invest $1,000 right now?</h2>
<p>When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool <em>Share Advisor</em> newsletter he has run for over ten years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*</p>
<p>Scott just revealed what he believes could be the 'five best ASX stocks' for investors to buy right now. We believe these stocks are trading at attractive prices and Scott thinks they could be great buys right now…</p>
<p>  <a class="cta-btn" href="https://www.fool.ca">See the 5 Stocks</a></p>
<p>  <small>* Returns as of 6 March 2025</small>
</div><p><strong>More reading</strong></p><ul><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/i-screened-the-asx-200-for-shares-that-could-outperform-over-the-next-5-years-this-is-what-i-found/'>I screened the ASX 200 for shares that could outperform over the next 5 years. This is what I found</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/could-just-2-asx-etfs-be-enough-to-build-serious-wealth/'>Could just 2 ASX ETFs be enough to build serious wealth?</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/top-brokers-name-3-asx-shares-to-buy-next-week-25-october-2026/'>Top brokers name 3 ASX shares to buy next week</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/i-think-these-3-asx-200-shares-could-outperform-the-market-in-2027/'>I think these 3 ASX 200 shares could outperform the market in 2027</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/cba-vs-wesfarmers-which-looks-best-for-a-50-year-old-investor-in-2026/'>CBA vs Wesfarmers: Which looks best for a 50-year-old investor in 2026?</a></li></ul><p><em><a href="https://boards.fool.com/profile/TMFHerveBlandin/info.aspx">Herve Blandin</a> has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia&#8217;s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. owns shares of and has recommended Zoom Video Communications. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Zoom Video Communications. The Motley Fool has a <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/fool-com-au-disclosure-policy/">disclosure policy</a>. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                                                                    </item>
                            <item>
                                <title>IBM&#039;s weak results hide its growth potential</title>
                <link>https://www.fool.com.au/2019/10/21/ibms-weak-results-hide-its-growth-potential-usfeed/</link>
                                <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Herve Blandin]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[International Stock News]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/10/20/ibms-weak-results-hide-its-growth-potential.aspx</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Accounting rules and one-time items dragged down the tech giant's third-quarter numbers, but its long-term investment thesis remains attractive.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/2019/10/21/ibms-weak-results-hide-its-growth-potential-usfeed/">IBM&#039;s weak results hide its growth potential</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.fool.com.au">The Motley Fool Australia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                                                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="634" height="173" src="https://www.fool.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/TMF_HoldingCo_Logo_Primary_Magenta_RoyalPurple.svg" class="attachment-rss-thumbnail size-rss-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="a woman" style="float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;" decoding="async" /><p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/10/20/ibms-weak-results-hide-its-growth-potential.aspx?source=ifa74cs0000001&#038;utm_source=global&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=article">Fool.com</a>. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.</em></p>
<p>At first glance, <strong>International Business Machines</strong>' <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/tickers/NYSE-IBM/"><span class="ticker" data-id="203983">(NYSE: IBM)</span></a> third-quarter results looked disappointing, featuring declining revenue and shrinking earnings per share. But as has often been the case with the giant tech company, one-time items again muddied the picture. And based on conditions in its underlying business, the stock may constitute an interesting investment opportunity.</p>
<h2>Weak results</h2>
<p>IBM's revenue declined by 3.9% year over year to $18.0 billion during the third quarter. But excluding the effects of foreign currency and divestitures, the top line fell only 0.6%. Still, the company's fifth consecutive quarter of revenue declines should worry investors, especially since this was the first time that figure included $371 million from IBM's $34 billion Red Hat acquisition. </p>
<p>Also, IBM's GAAP operating margin dropped from 16.0% to 8.4%. And despite an effective tax rate of <em>negative</em> 9.9%, its GAAP net income decreased 38% year over year, from $2.69 billion to $1.67 billion. </p>
<p>During the earnings call, management highlighted the point that they had cut the company's $73 billion debt load by $6.7 billion to $66.3 billion. But that success isn't as significant as management suggested, due to the decrease in cash and equivalents. Excluding the impact of the Red Hat acquisition on IBM's cash balance, its net debt decreased by only $3.85 billion compared to the previous quarter.</p>
<h2>Temporary issues</h2>
<p>Short-term challenges explain the quarter's negative results.</p>
<p>Revenue from IBM's systems segment, which includes servers and storage systems, dropped 14.7%. But that performance shouldn't surprise investors. The third quarter marked the end of an IBM product cycle -- the company started shipping its new mainframe z15 server during the last week of September. Thus, revenue from the systems segment should increase over the next several quarters.</p>
<p>The decline in IBM's global technology services -- GTS -- was more surprising. GTS consists of managed and outsourcing services, cloud-delivered services, and maintenance activities. Since this segment provided 38.8% of the company's total revenue at a gross profit margin of 35.8% during the quarter, its performance impacted IBM in a meaningful way.</p>
<p>Management pinned the 5.3% decline in GTS revenue on a lack of extra business beyond that which the segment booked prior to the quarter. But that should turn around since signings -- a leading indicator of revenue -- increased by 20% during the third quarter.</p>
<h2>Growth on the horizon</h2>
<p>Beyond the challenging short-term results, there are credible scenarios for IBM to deliver revenue growth.</p>
<p>Under GAAP rules, Red Hat contributed $371 million to IBM's revenue during this recent quarter, but had it remained an independent company, with the same underlying results, it would have reported revenue of $987 million. The difference arises from a rule that requires companies to recognize their acquisitions' deferred revenues at fair value. This has one important consequence: It will lower the amount of revenue IBM will recognize from its Red Hat acquisition over the next few quarters. But it will also give the company favorable comparisons further down the road.</p>
<p>In addition, since Red Hat was purchased, its normalized revenue growth accelerated from percentages in the mid-teens to 20%. IBM is already taking advantage of cross-selling opportunities to propose Red Hat solutions to its large client base. </p>
<p>And taking into account the new product cycle in IBM's systems segment, management confirmed it is still targeting revenue growth in the mid-single-digit percentages over the medium term -- the same forecast it announced after the Red Hat acquisition.</p>
<h2>A simple and attractive investment proposition</h2>
<p>With only one quarter left in 2019, IBM's management still forecasts non-GAAP earnings per share and free cash flow to reach $12.80 and $12 billion, respectively, for the year.</p>
<p>At the time of this writing, the market values this tech stock at a forward P/E ratio of 10.2 and at a free-cash-flow multiple of 9.9. Those modest valuation figures indicate the market doesn't expect much growth. Thus, long-term investors should consider IBM as a slow-growth investment at a reasonable price.</p>
<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/10/20/ibms-weak-results-hide-its-growth-potential.aspx?source=ifa74cs0000001&#038;utm_source=global&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=article">Fool.com</a>. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.</em></p><p>The post <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/2019/10/21/ibms-weak-results-hide-its-growth-potential-usfeed/">IBM&#039;s weak results hide its growth potential</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.fool.com.au">The Motley Fool Australia</a>.</p>
<div class="ad-container">
<h2>Wondering where to invest $1,000 right now?</h2>
<p>When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool <em>Share Advisor</em> newsletter he has run for over ten years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*</p>
<p>Scott just revealed what he believes could be the 'five best ASX stocks' for investors to buy right now. We believe these stocks are trading at attractive prices and Scott thinks they could be great buys right now…</p>
<p>  <a class="cta-btn" href="https://www.fool.ca">See the 5 Stocks</a></p>
<p>  <small>* Returns as of 6 March 2025</small>
</div><p><strong>More reading</strong></p><ul><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/i-screened-the-asx-200-for-shares-that-could-outperform-over-the-next-5-years-this-is-what-i-found/'>I screened the ASX 200 for shares that could outperform over the next 5 years. This is what I found</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/could-just-2-asx-etfs-be-enough-to-build-serious-wealth/'>Could just 2 ASX ETFs be enough to build serious wealth?</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/top-brokers-name-3-asx-shares-to-buy-next-week-25-october-2026/'>Top brokers name 3 ASX shares to buy next week</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/i-think-these-3-asx-200-shares-could-outperform-the-market-in-2027/'>I think these 3 ASX 200 shares could outperform the market in 2027</a></li><li> <a href='https://www.fool.com.au/2026/10/25/cba-vs-wesfarmers-which-looks-best-for-a-50-year-old-investor-in-2026/'>CBA vs Wesfarmers: Which looks best for a 50-year-old investor in 2026?</a></li></ul><p><em><a href="https://boards.fool.com/profile/HerveB/info.aspx">Herve Blandin</a> owns shares of IBM. The Motley Fool Australia's parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has the following options: long January 2020 $200 calls on IBM, short January 2020 $200 puts on IBM, and short January 2020 $155 calls on IBM. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/what-does-it-mean-to-be-motley/">diverse range of insights</a> makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a <a href="https://www.fool.com.au/fool-com-au-disclosure-policy/">disclosure policy</a>. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
                                                                                                                    </item>
                    </channel>
</rss>
