Do you know the huge hidden pitfalls of commodity price forecasts?

Relying on forecasts to make an investment decision can be a huge mistake, as investors in Woodside Petroleum Limited (ASX:WPL) and Santos Ltd (ASX:STO) may discover to their cost.

| More on:

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Unless you've been living on the moon, you will know by now that the price of oil has dropped substantially.

If you're a regular reader of fool.com.au or financial articles in general, you'll also know that ratings agency Standard & Poor's has lowered its forecasts for oil prices several times in the past few months, delivering a credit rating downgrade to Aussie producer Santos Ltd (ASX: STO) in the process.

Future credit rating changes may or may not be forthcoming for other Australian producers like Woodside Petroleum Limited (ASX: WPL), Origin Energy Ltd (ASX: ORG), and Oil Search Limited (ASX: OSH).

Those credit ratings – and thus the value of shares and cost of a company's debt – depend in a large part on the assumptions of the future oil price from rating agencies.

I personally use these assumptions as little more than an indicator of market sentiment, however they are widely covered in the media and often treated as gospel and forecasts, despite the fact that they are neither, often inaccurate, and prone to change on a monthly basis.

As one of the most visible ratings agencies, Standard & Poor's (S&P) serves as a good example of the inscrutability of these assumptions.

Here's a quick compilation of what that agency's oil assumptions looked like in recent months (All prices refer to Brent Crude oil, listed in US$/ barrel).

S&P forecast made in June 2014 S&P forecast made in Nov 2014 S&P forecast made in Dec 2014 S&P forecast made in Jan 2015
Average prices forecast for 2014 $110 $85 $75
Average prices forecast for 2015 $105 $90 $80 $55
Average prices forecast for 2016 $100 $90 $85 $65
Average prices forecast for 2017
and beyond
$95 $90 $85 $80

It is important to note that these are price assumptions, not forecasts. They are an expectation of where a commodity price will be based on prevalent market dynamics at the time the assumption is made.

Furthermore, they are only as good as the formula used to develop them.

For widely traded commodities like oil and gas, Standard and Poor's methodology uses the futures curve 'as the starting point for our pricing assumptions' and also uses 'market indicators' and some qualitative factors in its short-term (year 1 and 2) pricing analysis.

As readers can clearly see, this is borne out in the table. Back in June 2014 when all was fine and dandy, Brent Crude oil futures were trading around $110 per barrel. S&P's oil price forecast for June 2014? $110 per barrel.

In November, futures prices dropped to ~$84 a barrel. S&P's forecast? $85 a barrel.

December 2014 futures were trading at $80 each (forecast $75). October 2015 futures are hovering around $56 a barrel (forecast $55), and February 2016 futures are trading for around $47 (forecast $65).

While S&P may well use its own methodology, the fact that its short-term assumptions change to match futures prices bring into question the real value of these figures.

Since futures generally follow market perception of what's going to happen with the oil industry, Standard and Poor's closer targets are effectively mirroring market sentiment and 'groupthink' rather than providing independent commentary.

S&P even goes so far as to state that if there "is at least a 20% difference between our futures prices and our near-term pricing assumptions and we view the difference to be sustainable, then we will typically modify our assumptions."

This is why forecasts have changed so rapidly over the past few months, since OPEC declared its intentions not to cut production to support prices. In S&P's defence, this is not something that could reasonably be predicted. However, long-term forecasts are equally problematic.

Long-term (two year and longer) forecasts use 'Market- and issuer-specific supply and demand fundamentals' as well as examining spare capacity, cost curves in the industry, and internal price expectations used by companies in their forward-looking plans.

While S&P's current (Jan 2015) long-term forecasts for 2016 look more accurate than February 2016's futures prices, for instance, the analysis of future supply and demand did not lead researchers to draw the same price conclusions in November and December as they did in January.

In the final two months of last year oil was still forecast to be at US$90 and US$85 a barrel in 2016 despite it becoming apparent that there would be a significant surplus due to rising US production and OPEC maintaining production targets.

Now all of a sudden in January, a little over 30 days later, oil is predicted to be US$20 a barrel lower in 2016 than was forecast in December. Supply and demand cannot have changed so drastically in that time.

It's not the only time S&P has got their long term price assumptions wrong, with a January 30, 2014 update assuming prices of  US$110/$100 per tonne for iron ore in 2014 and 2015 despite ample evidence that massive oversupply was coming.

I personally wrote an article in December 2013 suggesting that prices would fall in 2014 (although not to the magnitude that they did), and Motley Fool analyst Scott Phillips beat me to the punch by more than two years, calling an iron ore bubble way back in September 2012.

Sure enough, the commodity came unravelled partway through 2014, and now trades for US$70 per tonne.

Two weeks after Mike King's article on the fall was published, Standard and Poor's released updated price assumptions of US$95 per tonne for 2014, 2015, and 2016.

This certainly raises some questions for the validity of ratings agencies price assumptions, doesn't it?

Motley Fool contributor Sean O'Neill doesn't own shares in any company mentioned.

More on ⏸️ Investing

Close up of baby looking puzzled
Retail Shares

What has happened to the Baby Bunting (ASX:BBN) share price this year?

It's been a volatile year so far for the Aussie nursery retailer. We take a closer look

Read more »

woman holds sign saying 'we need change' at climate change protest
ETFs

3 ASX ETFs that invest in companies fighting climate change

If you want to shift some of your investments into more ethical companies, exchange-traded funds can offer a good option

Read more »

a jewellery store attendant stands at a cabinet displaying opulent necklaces and earrings featuring diamonds and precious stones.
⏸️ Investing

The Michael Hill (ASX: MHJ) share price poised for growth

Investors will be keeping an eye on the Michael Hill International Limited (ASX: MHJ) share price today. The keen interest…

Read more »

ASX shares buy unstoppable asx share price represented by man in superman cape pointing skyward
⏸️ Investing

The Atomos (ASX:AMS) share price is up 15% in a week

The Atomos (ASX: AMS) share price has surged 15% this week. Let's look at what's ahead as the company build…

Read more »

Two people in suits arm wrestle on a black and white chess board.
Retail Shares

How does the Temple & Webster (ASX:TPW) share price stack up against Nick Scali (ASX:NCK)?

How does the Temple & Webster (ASX: TPW) share price stack up against rival furniture retailer Nick Scali Limited (ASX:…

Read more »

A medical researcher works on a bichip, indicating share price movement in ASX tech companies
Healthcare Shares

The Aroa (ASX:ARX) share price has surged 60% since its IPO

The Aroa (ASX:ARX) share price has surged 60% since the Polynovo (ASX: PNV) competitor listed on the ASX in July.…

Read more »

asx investor daydreaming about US shares
⏸️ How to Invest

How to buy US shares from Australia right now

If you have been wondering how to buy US shares from Australia to gain exposure from the highly topical market,…

Read more »

⏸️ Investing

Why Fox (NASDAQ:FOX) might hurt News Corp (ASX:NWS) shareholders

News Corporation (ASX: NWS) might be facing some existential threats from its American cousins over the riots on 6 January

Read more »